Why do you hate Partick Thistle? - Page 6 - General Morton Chatter - TheMortonForum.com Jump to content
TheMortonForum.com

Why do you hate Partick Thistle?


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Cet Homme Charmant said:

Yesterday's game probably threw them a lifeline

A considerable chunk of the Ibrox money will disappear on paying off three of the first team coaching staff. It's probably the only reason they could afford to sack them.

A further statement by The Jags Foundation here:

https://thejagsfoundation.co.uk/statement-concerning-the-clubs-finances/

Tl;dr - their previous board of charlatans absolutely fucked it and their current one have a fight on their hands to get spending under control

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Oh Lord, Brian Wake

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TRVMP said:

Doesn't look particularly worrying to me. We've been in a similar boat: budget tight, need external investment. Without Dalrada that could just as easily be us.

Aye, not in this statement but delving further paints an awkward picture for them.

They made a bottom line operating loss for FY21/22 of £215k (which was propped up by Director handouts and Queens Park groundshare income which they won't have in the next accounts).  Their true operating loss level without that non-recurring income was closer to £500k for each of 21/22 and 20/21.

Their board has continued to spunk money at the same level since, even actually voting to increase the playing budget, and set a budget banking on promotion for this season.

Their cash reserves fell to £330k, the lowest level since 2016.

Interesting that you made the Morton comparison. The Jags Foundation also made the Morton comparison, giving us an honourable mention in their assessment of their accounts, highlighting that they were looking worse than us at a time when our financial situation was being well documented.

Screenshot_20230214_095311_Samsung Notes.jpg

The outgoing board wouldn't let anyone do any due diligence ahead of the share transfer. They also did some smoke and mirrors tactic of using a different method to evaluate the fixed assets like the stadium (rebuild cost rather than market value) to inflate them in these accounts so they would paint a rosier picture to fans.

There's more skeletons to be found in there for sure.

Edited by Jamie_M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dunning1874 said:

A considerable chunk of the Ibrox money will disappear on paying off three of the first team coaching staff. It's probably the only reason they could afford to sack them.

Think the wording 'relieved of their first team duties' might indicate that they will remain on payroll rather than a payoff.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jamie_M said:

Think the wording 'relieved of their first team duties' might indicate that they will remain on payroll rather than a payoff.

 

Presumably they will be paying a new management team at the same time, so the money is still going to disappear, just not right away.

"Any nation given the opportunity to regain its national sovereignty and which then rejects it is so far beneath contempt that it is hard to put words to it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Alibi said:

Presumably they will be paying a new management team at the same time, so the money is still going to disappear, just not right away.

Doolan is in charge in the interim. Don't know if that involves them giving him a wage hike.

McGhee needs some support, there's no-one backing him up.
Hayes playing it forward, Bell being forced to do it all alone, now forward from Marr, here's Ritchie, still Andy Ritchie, look at the control...

That is a marvellous goal from Andy Ritchie. Twenty minutes on the clock and Morton's supporters come alive. A goal which epitomises the control, the arrogance, the cheek of Andy Ritchie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Alibi said:

Presumably they will be paying a new management team at the same time, so the money is still going to disappear, just not right away.

Aye, easier to swallow than a lump sum payoff and mitigated further if they keep their appointment in house like sticking with the interim team.

Presume we did similar with Gus rather than paying him off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/14/2023 at 4:21 AM, Jamie_M said:

Aye, not in this statement but delving further paints an awkward picture for them.

They made a bottom line operating loss for FY21/22 of £215k (which was propped up by Director handouts and Queens Park groundshare income which they won't have in the next accounts).  Their true operating loss level without that non-recurring income was closer to £500k for each of 21/22 and 20/21.

Their board has continued to spunk money at the same level since, even actually voting to increase the playing budget, and set a budget banking on promotion for this season.

Their cash reserves fell to £330k, the lowest level since 2016.

Interesting that you made the Morton comparison. The Jags Foundation also made the Morton comparison, giving us an honourable mention in their assessment of their accounts, highlighting that they were looking worse than us at a time when our financial situation was being well documented.

Screenshot_20230214_095311_Samsung Notes.jpg

The outgoing board wouldn't let anyone do any due diligence ahead of the share transfer. They also did some smoke and mirrors tactic of using a different method to evaluate the fixed assets like the stadium (rebuild cost rather than market value) to inflate them in these accounts so they would paint a rosier picture to fans.

There's more skeletons to be found in there for sure.

This might sound a bit like victim-blaming but if the selling party is unwilling to allow due diligence and access to the books, the correct action is to walk away from negotiations, not to accept the transferred shares. It's literally unthinkable to me that you would, if in control of a limited company or any other corporate body, take on an unknown amount of liabilities and assets without having a chance to review them first.

Having read this, fuck 'em. Let them learn that lesson the hard way.

  • Like 1

EOho8Pw.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TRVMP said:

This might sound a bit like victim-blaming but if the selling party is unwilling to allow due diligence and access to the books, the correct action is to walk away from negotiations, not to accept the transferred shares. It's literally unthinkable to me that you would, if in control of a limited company or any other corporate body, take on an unknown amount of liabilities and assets without having a chance to review them first.

Having read this, fuck 'em. Let them learn that lesson the hard way.

Aye the party accepting that share transfer were the PTFC Trust who were, in simplistic terms, the patsies or fake fan organisation. The Jags Foundation, who are the MCT equivalent in this scenario, were opposed to that share transfer but after it was done have since entered into an agreement with the PFTC Trust to work together, accepting it couldn't be undone and coming on board after all the previous directors walked.

Whether they were wise to get themselves inside the tent and tainted by association with the current interim board remains to be seen.

 

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Oh Lord, Brian Wake

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, dunning1874 said:

Aye the party accepting that share transfer were the PTFC Trust who were, in simplistic terms, the patsies or fake fan organisation. The Jags Foundation, who are the MCT equivalent in this scenario, were opposed to that share transfer but after it was done have since entered into an agreement with the PFTC Trust to work together, accepting it couldn't be undone and coming on board after all the previous directors walked.

Whether they were wise to get themselves inside the tent and tainted by association with the current interim board remains to be seen.

That's what they call a fait accompli. If I was in the Jags Foundation I'd be livid, though.

EOho8Pw.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...