Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Admin

Match Thread - Morton vs QOTS (Championship 19th December)

Recommended Posts

Think we have to acknowledge that Muirhead's performances in the last few weeks, and today in particular, have actually been pretty good. While his performances early on in the season were poor, I thought some of the criticisms on here were a bit OTT. Fair play to him, let's hope he can sustain his recent improvement, there's definitely a player there.

Have to say, the spirit and character of the whole squad is excellent. Not the most naturally gifted players on the planet, but they've got a great work ethic that you can't help but admire. They seem to be genuinely likeable bunch as well. Hats off to them! Also think Strapp's got a great future in the game.

I've really enjoyed being able to watch the games this season, really hope that the match streaming will continue after Covid. As TRVMP mentioned, Andy Ritchie is a totally unexpected revaluation as co-commentator, insightful, honest and humorous. 

Edited by Cet Homme Charmant
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What really concerned me yesterday was that McAllister went off with around 15 minutes left.

It has been discussed that should MacAdam have to go off injured or be sent off, Jim would be his replacement. Had that. Happened yesterday where did that leave us? We really need a second keeper on the books in the January window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, The Bewilderedbeast said:

What really concerned me yesterday was that McAllister went off with around 15 minutes left.

It has been discussed that should MacAdam have to go off injured or be sent off, Jim would be his replacement. Had that. Happened yesterday where did that leave us? We really need a second keeper on the books in the January window.

Ideally we need to shift some of the deadwood in the squad and acquire a back up keeper. Despite recent results the squad remains unbalanced. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Bewilderedbeast said:

What really concerned me yesterday was that McAllister went off with around 15 minutes left.

It has been discussed that should MacAdam have to go off injured or be sent off, Jim would be his replacement. Had that. Happened yesterday where did that leave us? We really need a second keeper on the books in the January window.

Discussed where and by who?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The easiest way of getting a 2nd keeper in will be the loan market. The only problem there is that in the initial period there will no doubt be a requirement to play the loanee ahead of MacAdam which would be harsh


here today, gone to hell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, bob_the_builder said:

The easiest way of getting a 2nd keeper in will be the loan market. The only problem there is that in the initial period there will no doubt be a requirement to play the loanee ahead of MacAdam which would be harsh

Agree, McAdam has already showed that he can equip himself perfectly well at this level. If he hadn't made that save at 1-0 yesterday who knows how the game would have panned out.

Better option for cover IMO would be a free agent on a short-term contract till the end of the season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jamie_M said:

Discussed where and by who?

 

On Sportsound a few times now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are emergency loans still available? Perhaps  the club are looking to that, in the event of an injury to McAdam, with an outfield player filling in for what remained of the 90 minutes of McAdam's game. IIRC, somebody on here had mentioned Muirhead as a possible stand-in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stevie Aitken's Love Child said:

I hear Sam Ramsbottom is still free...

Be better with Harry Ramsden.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Waverley said:

Are emergency loans still available? Perhaps  the club are looking to that, in the event of an injury to McAdam, with an outfield player filling in for what remained of the 90 minutes of McAdam's game. IIRC, somebody on here had mentioned Muirhead as a possible stand-in.

They are but only in exceptional circumstances. The SPFL/SFA could easily tell us to bugger off, it's our own fault for not putting together a squad properly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would the club even sanction signing a new goalkeeper? Would we need a loan which cost us nothing or someone to come in on (very) part time terms?

Hopefully McAdams sufferers no injuries or sendings off this season. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be another Halliwell situation I’d assume. Just somebody capable of using their arms if needed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As with signing a goalkeeper on loan it needs approval from the SPFL board, but you can also temporarily recall goalkeepers from loans outside windows in an emergency so bringing Wylie back from Port Glasgow is also an option.

I guess if Hopkin had been comfortable that he was ready for Championship football he wouldn't have been loaned out in the first place right enough, so assuming McElhone agrees you'd think a signing would be more likely.


Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Brian Wake my Lord, Brian Wake

Oh Lord, Brian Wake

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd recall Wylie. Saves spending unnecessary money on a keeper who probably won't play all season. Just need a competent keeper for the bench in the unlikely event that McAdams gets injured.

If we were to lose McAdams for a longer period, we bring in a loan or free agent.


All in with a Doyle Brunson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooooh it's a good video

It has to be said - Lewis Strapp did extremely well when their free-kick hit the bar. His reaction was superb, he got in ahead of two or three Queens players to nod the ball away to relative safety. He was there to mark their number 16 and despite that guy having a few inches on him, he was nowhere near it because Strapp was in the way. Fearless stuff from him as usual. As he gets more experienced he's popping up in the right place more and more.

Edited by TRVMP

The stadium was just resting in my account

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Alibi said:

Strapp is a terrific player. Not just a tenacious tackler but has good feet. One move there he completely wrong footed his opponent to create space to push forward - minor thing but showed great poise. Get him signed on a ten year contract.

 

Agree. Can definitely see him develop into a box to box midfielder. Certainly has the attributes in terms of skill, passing, athleticism. 

  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, piehutt said:

 

Agree. Can definitely see him develop into a box to box midfielder. Certainly has the attributes in terms of skill, passing, athleticism. 

Wtf is that ūüėāūüėāūüėā

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably do a decent job in midfield, just as Messi could slot in at left back if required. However Strapp is doing well at left back so why do a Mark Russell with him? 

  • Upvote 2

"Any nation given the opportunity to regain its national sovereignty and which then rejects it is so far beneath contempt that it is hard to put words to it."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/20/2020 at 8:10 PM, Madton said:

I'd recall Wylie. Saves spending unnecessary money on a keeper who probably won't play all season. Just need a competent keeper for the bench in the unlikely event that McAdams gets injured.

If we were to lose McAdams for a longer period, we bring in a loan or free agent.

Wylie will be training with us anyway so apart from having a keeper on the bench he's pretty much available and part of the squad assuming we can recall him. 

I'd much rather a keeper on the bench too but I'm guessing that was Hopkin's logic until he decided he shouldn't have signed another winger and another keeper was a sensible idea. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.