TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 Just now, dunning1874 said: McPake should have finished it there. Quite encouraged by some of our passing in the final third, but the way we fell out of game after going ahead was a concern. A team that isn't a made-up joke like QoS would love running at our midfield. Nonetheless I too am very happy with the attacking. Nesbitt is oddly off the boil, but a bit of confidence and some final balls from others will make us dangerous.
JLTON Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 could use make out what the formation was in the 1st half there? Found it difficult to tell with the camera work n all. Def 4 at the back tho. Is it 4-1-3-2 as suggested earlier?
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 3 minutes ago, JLTON said: could use make out what the formation was in the 1st half there? Found it difficult to tell with the camera work n all. Def 4 at the back tho. Is it 4-1-3-2 as suggested earlier? Honestly mate, I'm struggling to make out what fucking sport it is.
AyrshireTon Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 Ah shite. McGhee needs some support, there's no-one backing him up. Hayes playing it forward, Bell being forced to do it all alone, now forward from Marr, here's Ritchie, still Andy Ritchie, look at the control... That is a marvellous goal from Andy Ritchie. Twenty minutes on the clock and Morton's supporters come alive. A goal which epitomises the control, the arrogance, the cheek of Andy Ritchie.
JLTON Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 1 minute ago, TRVMP said: Honestly mate, I'm struggling to make out what fucking sport it is. it looks more like a 4-2-3-1 to me.... FUCK
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 The one thing the cameraman did catch is that it was a free header at head-height. In other words, it wasn't defended.
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 Can't fault Nesbitt for effort tonight, he's tracking back well, but he's been woeful going forward.
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Scott said: McPake looks a player. Looks like he can beat a man, but I have question marks around his vision. Nonetheless this is an hour into his first game so I'll try not to be too harsh.
AyrshireTon Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 Thought Orsi was playing well (from what the camera has captured). McGhee needs some support, there's no-one backing him up. Hayes playing it forward, Bell being forced to do it all alone, now forward from Marr, here's Ritchie, still Andy Ritchie, look at the control... That is a marvellous goal from Andy Ritchie. Twenty minutes on the clock and Morton's supporters come alive. A goal which epitomises the control, the arrogance, the cheek of Andy Ritchie.
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 That was well-worked. Got to say I thought it was offside but seemingly not.
port-ton Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 Actually quite impressed with us in an attacking sense when the camera has shown us. 17 attackers may pay off in the end. Good people will do good things, bad people will do bad things, but only with religion do good people do bad things!
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 9 minutes ago, TRVMP said: Can't fault Nesbitt for effort tonight, he's tracking back well, but he's been woeful going forward. Fair play to him. He's fit and quick and he's looking for the ball everywhere, and now it's paid off. I'm a huge fan of his. He can play a lot better than he's done tonight. When he does, we'll be cooking.
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 That was great from McPake. Did well to make space for that shot and forced a good save.
Stevie Aitken's Love Child Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 So we've only used 3 of the possible 5 subs. Seems unusual to have them all made by the 75th minute.
TRVMP Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 Poor defending but that's to be expected when you don't have a right-back.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.