Megrahi........ A Curious Case............................... - Page 12 - General Nonsense - TheMortonForum.com Jump to content
TheMortonForum.com

Megrahi........ A Curious Case...............................


Guest David Edwards

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 614
  • Created
  • Last Reply
At least we had the last laugh - Sent the bas.ard home in a shell suit!

Bravo :lol:

 

 

:lol:

 

Best post in this most s***ey of threads by a country mile. :lol:

We agree mon rentier. :blink:

 

 

 

Why is this so called Shop keeper now living in Australia and aparently quite a wealthy person now.

Witness protection? See if the yanks had bought him off he might be in yankee-land. :huh:

 


"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences."

The goal of Socialism is Communism- Lenin

 

Je ne suis pas Marxiste : K Marx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it Tartan Day in New York is cancelled :lol:

 

That's Eck's next homecummin or whatever fecked. :rolleyes:

 

So anyway, Hindley, did the English do wrong? :unsure:

 


"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences."

The goal of Socialism is Communism- Lenin

 

Je ne suis pas Marxiste : K Marx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's Eck's next homecummin or whatever fecked. :rolleyes:

 

So anyway, Hindley, did the English do wrong? :unsure:

 

 

Don't know enough about her case in trying to get out of prison.

And it's none of my business, it's an English matter.

Don't blame me I voted Yes!!!! - We tried to tell you !!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest David Edwards

McCaskill's press call statement was dreadful and the subsequent interviews were even worse, he appeared like an automaton, constantly repeating his homilies about the innately compassionate values of the Scottish people. It was all bollocks of course, (he obviously hasn't sampled this messageboard) but I genuinely sympathise with his predicament.

Megrahi may have been a patsy, now I fear that McCaskill might be an even bigger one. The British, Americans and Megrahi himself seem to have stitched him up good and proper, he's left in the classic no-win situation. Where is Eck in all this though? Has he left his colleague out on a limb, acting true to his forte as the 'consumate politician'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"edd Posted Today, 09:13 PM all the ignorant americans who shout "shame on you scotland" should **** off and start facing the facts."

 

And the facts are?

 

Megrahi was found guilty of mass murder, yes/no?

Sentenced to life in prison. yes/no?

Released on compansionate grounds. yes/no?

 

Now answer the following -

 

Out of the 30 convicted prisoners released on compasionate grounds since 2001, how many were murderers 0/30?

I'll give a clue to the answer, it's below 1.

 

I just watched Megrahi's return to Libya with Scottish flags waving, people welcoming him back as a hero.

That is wrong.

 

I can see headlines now - Convicted mass murderer of 270 freed on compasionate grounds. WOW sic.

 

Not a good day to be a Scot in the US. You can't defend the undefendable.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest David Edwards
Scotland should be ashamed. It is one of those days in history that make you ashamed to be Scottish. Our whole Criminal Justice system has been undermined by Politicians.

 

Megrahi's dab's were all over the evidence. If it was English law i'd be a sceptic, but in Scots law we rely on corroboration and on our law the man was convicted.

 

The 270 victims in this attack did not have the chance to go home for the last 3 months of their life, there was no compassionate grounds for these people and for the families left to grieve.

 

For MacAskill and the other Politicians to come out with pish about we being decent people and it's the right thing to do? Does he speak on behalf of the people of Scotland? I think not.

 

What next, Damien Muir's murderer to be let free because he has swine flu...

 

This is the day our integrity as a nation died.

 

I agree with a lot of what you say, but your last is unfair I think. Our nationhood is presently denied to us, there'll be time to pass judgement on our integrity (as a nation) once we regain our nationhood. I suspect that McCaskill's been set up to take the flak for the past misdemeanours and clandestine deals of the British and Americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is Eck in all this though? Has he left his colleague out on a limb, acting true to his forte as the 'consumate politician'?

You're getting as predictable and boring as Tam.

 

There's no doubt that if Salmon had taken a higher profile in this you'd be on here accusing him of showboating and hogging the limelight, and interfering in the Justice Minister's remit. :rolleyes:

 

You hate Salmond, message received and understood David.

 

This whole episode was a classic no-win situation for MacAskill that was not of his or the Scottish Government's making. He was lumbered with a horrible decision to make that no-one would envy. The fact that rival politicians and the usual suspects on here like you are attempting to make political gain from this is frankly a sign of yours and their desperation.

 

FWIW I think MacAskill did make a couple of mistakes in his handling of this for which he could have been reasonably criticised. But sensible discussion on here with your and Tam's tactic of indiscriminate attacks on anything and everything SNP using far fetched conspiracy theories and downright lies makes that all but impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest David Edwards
You hate Salmond, message received and understood David.

:lol:

Message not received or deliberately misunderstood, rent collector.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest David Edwards
your and Tam's tactic of indiscriminate attacks on anything and everything SNP using far fetched conspiracy theories and downright lies makes that all but impossible.

:lol:

Quote examples of my 'far fetched conspiracy theories and downright lies' please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest David Edwards
Read the considered thoughts of Tam on this very thread, there's plenty to choose from.

You mentioned my 'far fetched conspiracy theories and downright lies'. Quote me please, not McB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest David Edwards
I genuinely sympathise with his predicament. Megrahi may have been a patsy, now I fear that McCaskill might be an even bigger one. The British, Americans and Megrahi himself seem to have stitched him up good and proper, he's left in the classic no-win situation.

 

 

This whole episode was a classic no-win situation for MacAskill that was not of his or the Scottish Government's making. He was lumbered with a horrible decision to make that no-one would envy.

 

FWIW I think MacAskill did make a couple of mistakes in his handling of this for which he could have been reasonably criticised.

 

For feck's sake CHC, stop repeating my every word. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people just love twsiting this to suit themselves.

there is an opinion that the SNP lay down at the behest of the UK Govt, yeah if theres one party that wants to upholf the uk government, its the snp

despite the ranting in the media (its somehow possible to fake cancer) the man has a death sentence on him as sure as morton will still be shoite tomorrow.,

even if we presume he is guilty, to keep him in prison would be to exacerbate his condition, we retain the moral high ground if we show that unlike the yanks (who like to assinate criminals remember) we can rise above the sniping and show that mercy can breeed remorse,

We are not home and dry, we could not even be said to be home and vigorously towelling ourselves off!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Judges were obviously convinced it was beyond reasonable doubt or they would have found him not proven.

 

Oh and there has never been any miscarriage of justice in trials has there?

 

I feel sorry for families of victims but I have , like many, doubts of the conviction. As for Scotland being ashamed , there is far more to be ashamed of being an American, for a start the said Iran Air Flight 655.

“The Bible may, indeed does, contain a warrant for trafficking in humans, for ethnic cleansing, for slavery, for bride-price, and for indiscriminate massacre, but we are not bound by any of it because it was put together by crude, uncultured human mammals.â€

― Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edd's post details the flimsy evidence on which Megrahi was convicted. The SCCRC recommended that the conviction had been unsafe. Megrahi's appeal has been deferred for an inordinate length of time-WHY?

 

A point clearly missed by many posters is that his conviction (even if he WAS guilty) shames the Scottish legal system.

 

It is entirely possible that Megrahi IS innocent-a 57 year old man, father and husband- rotting to death in a Scotish prison from advanced prostatic carcinoma .

 

Given that possibility, his release will please God, Allah, and all fair minded folk.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they pretend to befriend you, then you win!

 

YER BARD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're in agreement there.

 

 

 

I'm saying he should die in Jail because under Scottish Law he is a mass murderer.

 

Should we have let Myra Hindley out? If Ian Brady gets cancer should he be released.

 

I think that if someone has a short time to live and is no longer a danger to society then compassionate release is a reasonable course of action, particularly where they have relatives. Should be for a limited time though to prevent "miracle cures" like Saunders - if they don't die as forecast, wheech them back inside.

"Any nation given the opportunity to regain its national sovereignty and which then rejects it is so far beneath contempt that it is hard to put words to it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...