Bryan Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 If temps is rested How about this GK McGurn RB Weatherson CB Harding CB Greacan LB McGregor RM Finlyson CM Miller CM Walker LM McAlister ST Lilley ST McLaren "Boy, I got vision, and the rest of the world wears bifocals."
carlito Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 That would do me! Or Jason could just come straight in to Templeman's place. I spit in the face of people who don't want to be cool!
Rancho Pancho Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 Looks good to start of with Bryan but I would change to this for a period in the game if need be. GK McGurn RB Weatherson CB Harding CB Greacan LB McGregor RM Finlyson CM Miller LM McAlister ST McLaren (in behind the front 2) ST J Walker ST Lilley
ThornTON Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 RM FinlysonCM Miller LM McAlister 19130[/snapback] Are we playing the Care Bears?
puggsy_ton Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 I reckon tea V raith with straight switch Jason for Templeman instead of messing about with other peoples places.
edd Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 yeah, the current line up is fine, just swap jason for templeman. if we have to go 4-4-2, though, i'd go for bryan's line-up.
forza ton Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 id be happy with that brian (think i posted a similar line up the other night but i was pished!)
piehutt Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 Bryan, have been saying since after the Gretna game that we should play a formation like that, and would probably side with that team. Def don't think we can afford 3 forward players and feel that it is too easy for the wingbacks to basically bypass the midfield leaving Alex and Chris struggling in the middle doing thw work of 3 or 4 men. I also feel that McLarens best position is in the centre as he has always got goals when playing there for us (look at his 1st game and on Sat when he went up front) It's also good to be in a position with playing 4 very competent midfielders that we can really put our foot on the ball, hold onto posession and dominate a game. With McLaren, McAllister and Finlayson basically being attack minded players in a kinda floating role it's looking like all or nothing with us either getting a shot on goal or losing posession. Twitter... tweet tweet
rm2k5 Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 not sure about tomorow but i would like: gk mcgurn rb millar cb greacen cb harding lb mcgregor rm finlayson cm walker am mclaren lm mccallister st lilley st weatherson
AyrshireTon Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 Wht not revert to the old school-style of all 11 players chasing the ball? AT McGhee needs some support, there's no-one backing him up. Hayes playing it forward, Bell being forced to do it all alone, now forward from Marr, here's Ritchie, still Andy Ritchie, look at the control... That is a marvellous goal from Andy Ritchie. Twenty minutes on the clock and Morton's supporters come alive. A goal which epitomises the control, the arrogance, the cheek of Andy Ritchie.
theoceanfloor Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 I'd go for a 2-3-5....it was good enough for us to win a Scottish Cup, so surely we could use it to beat a bunch of Rugby loving farmers? GK McGurn LCB Harding RCB Greacen CM A Walker LM J McAllister RM KFinlayson F Weatherson F McLaren F J Walker F Lilley F Templeman
MIFTHEBINO Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 Templeman always scores against us though! www.stirlingalbion.com
gmfc_boyo Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 Templeman always scores against us though! 19721[/snapback] hopefully he'll keep doing so No sympathy for the devil; keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride...
IainMorton Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 --------------------McGurn---------------- ---Weatherson---Greacen---Harding--- -------------------A. Walker-------------- ----Finlayson------Millar------McAllister- -------------------McLaren---------------- ------Templeman----------Lilley---------
Doddie Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 --------------------McGurn---------------- ---Weatherson---Greacen---Harding--- -------------------A. Walker-------------- ----Finlayson------Millar------McAllister- -------------------McLaren---------------- ------Templeman----------Lilley--------- 19739[/snapback] Would agree with that. Taht is the team for tomorrow.
ThornTON Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 Why? Because it's the same team we've played in every game so far this season? Wow! You two should become palm readers!
edd Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 i suspect that's what jim will play - ie. the same line-up and formation that played gretna, raith and ayr, but i'd rather see jason start ahead of templeman. dunno if anyone else noticed but we went to a 2-3-5 at the end of the ayr game which seemed to go like this: mcgurn greacen - harding millar - a.walker - mcallister finlayson - lilley - weatherson - j.walker - mclaren i think it would be a bit daft to start with that formation in a league game, but maybe it would be worth trying it in a friendly at some point to see if it would actually work ... it'll probably just end up being a 5-0-5 with big punts up the park, though ...
IainMorton Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 Why? Because it's the same team we've played in every game so far this season? Wow! You two should become palm readers! 19747[/snapback] No cos it's the formation that's been used the past few games and apart from the Ayr game it has worked well. Alex Walker is a holding midfielder so he should play in front of the defence and Andy McLaren is an attacking midfielder so he should play in behind Lilley and Templeman. We don't need to be palm readers to work out that's our best formation just now!
.thumb.jpeg.e0576d95ca087125d837a77c1dbfac73.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.