At the very least, allowing the statement to go out to 'keep the peace' with Laird, Dalrada, whoever else is at best very very poor judgement.
The fact of the matter is that for whatever reason he's presided over a litany of mishaps. Probably the worst shape we've been in off the pitch since the Scott era, including the various snafus in the Rae's tenure such as being unable to register Tidser. I don't know if he's been subject to threats and libel, like he says he has, but those are matters for the police and courts (respectively) and are separate from his performance as chairman, which has been totally risible. Why does he get to set the terms of his departure and issue what may well be a completely false narrative in doing so? Who works for who here?