TRVMP

Yeah, who snaked who here? Was it the trio who, shortly a week after running on a togetherness platform, demanded the resignation of three incumbent board members and sent out a rallying cry to that effect? Or was it the guys who didn't do that? Real mystery for the ages, that, I can see why you're so confused. Come off it. You can play this 'ooh it's not constructive' kumbayah act with someone else, but don't insult my intelligence with it. Let's say he's right about that. Wouldn't that be something material to mention while running for the board? That he's joining to steward the Estrella deal to completion, the deal he believes is a great opportunity for Morton to survive and thrive? And that it's under threat from the rest of the board?

None of this changes anything I said. I'm sure he is keen to stick his oar in, but this soon-to-be-ex-director had no idea what he was doing. His statement was an embarrassment, and with the attempted coup having failed, he's now chucked in. So I'm sure he still likes being in and around Cappielow and I'm sure he'll still hang about, but his MCT directorship consisted of: 1) running on a bunch of Braeside Cantera nonsense outside his remit, 2) getting elected, 3) trying to snake the other directors, 4) failing, and 5) resigning. And not a single youth prospect to be seen.

Anyone who read the two ex player's statements and thought they had the slightest clue wants their head checked. They don't know what MCT is and what it does. Increasingly just looks like they've wandered in to fulfill someone else's agenda.

I think we'd have an OK chance on appeal but probably not worth it, all things considered. I do think it was the wrong decision but also Cupps made it a decision by not decisively dealing with the ball over the top in the first place.

That'll ding dang do.

Is 11am too early Lol never mind, we just conceded This is going to end 3-2 isn't it

Thanks

Has it restarted? What minute are we at?

I think that goes without saying, but the ideal scenario is that the person is okay and that the game is played to completion.

It was nice while it lasted

Oh the Morton are pie

I live overseas so I'm obviously not the target audience for this unminuted, unrecorded session, but I have no confidence in the three of you. I don't have to give my reasons for this but I'll give just one - you, Graham, individually, ran for the board under false pretenses. You then tried to snake three other volunteers. Your big mates at Estrella tried intimidation tactics at OUR meeting via their weirdo member's ten hour droning statement, and when that failed you rewrote history to say that Estrella and Graham, who can do no wrong, were denied their share in Morton by the "potentially criminal" actions of the other directors. That's a wild allegation to be throwing around without evidence. And, again, it's not why you ran. You ran completely under false pretends, and that's disqualifying. I voted for you. I'll never believe another word out of your mouth. If you had any decency you'd have resigned by now. I didn't vote for Statler and Waldorf, I don't know how autonomous they've been in this, but we'd be well rid of them as well for an astonishing lack of sound judgement in their case.

He's not on the MCT board, that's why. The MCT Board enjoys the interesting distinction of having every member subject to a member's proposal for a vote, ranging from McLennan at 85, to 1 for Thomas Francis (poor guy, wonder what he did to annoy someone)?

It stems from this: McLennan "rallied the troops" to get McKinnon, Farren and Whitton ousted after his motion (plus Tweedle Dandie and Tweedle Dumbie) to get them removed failed. Many members have now called for McLennan to be removed, and it seems a majority of them have also sought the ouster of Ren and Stimpy. Certainly I have asked for all three of them to go.

I think the "who" is a premature question. We're running out of money in the new year as things stand. Is it worth hiring a new highly-paid staff member, given the likelihood of administration?