Pedrodelawasp

I get where you’re coming from - more effective coaching and instructions should certainly be the first order of business. As SpoonTon said, the motivation for having an extra centre back and central midfielder in front of them would, in theory, help with the issues you’ve highlighted. The hope would be another body at the back capable of getting a head on the ball at set pieces, then an extra man in the middle to press and make us harder to play through. It would then be up to Ballantyne and Okike to have the legs to get up the park on the break, with a striker and O’Halloran ahead. All well and good in theory, but no guarantee at all it would make enough of a difference to start picking up points. It shouldn’t be an overly complicated change to make, though that will very much depend on the coaching and game management from the dugout. Would hope for a change of some sort in any case…

Murray really needs to try something different - though I don’t hold out too much hope he will. Starting Robinson and Brophy briefly had me thinking he may have switched to a narrower 442 but, alas, he played a striker trying to regain fitness after a long injury layoff out wide. It has to be either Brophy or Robinson up front allowing one to come on for the other when knackered, then Gorman as an option to bring on to partner one of them. Would a 5311 or 3511 suit the squad better and make us at least a little harder to beat? Something along the lines of: P.S. I’m stuck in bed with some rotten virus, so this has mainly been an exercise in passing time and alleviating boredom.

Could this herald a change of shape?

Would expect it’ll take him a while to get up to speed after such a lengthy injury layoff, but imagine he’ll also be well motivated to get his career going again. Fingers crossed for the lad.

Darvel shared earlier that Nacho Novo’s stepson has passed away, aged only 26.

A lower offer for significantly more shares, at that.

Cheers. ETA I guess we’d need to know how long that commitment would be for and whether other annual payments would be forthcoming, if there would be separate payments made towards infrastructure/stadium improvements, sponsorship, etc. before judging the overall value. On the surface, would 150k plus 144k pa require quite drastic reduction in outgoings to be sustainable?

A post citing no sources on the Facebook group claims the offer is £150k for 51% and two spots on the board. I will assume this is utter drivel to be filed firmly in the bin, but thought some on here may enjoy the laugh.

Would be good to have a strong, motivational figure to help prevent heads from dropping.

Baws - we hadn’t been looking so bad, either.

It’s good to know there may be another group raising their head above the parapet to make an offer. Of course it remains to be seen what the level of investment is, what caveats there will be, who they wish to appoint to the board, etc.

The decent thing to do would be a commitment from everyone to wind their collective neck in and fulfil their current commitments in the interim until replacement board members can be identified and voted into post, at which time the incumbents will stand down. Perhaps a statement recognising emails requesting a vote for their removal but offering to stand down to save time and in recognition of their mishandling of matters?

Lucky dip on the euro millions tonight it is, then.

Morton on a pole match at Cappielow for control of the club.

Well this is all very wtf