port-ton's Content - Page 3 - TheMortonForum.com Jump to content
TheMortonForum.com

port-ton

Members
  • Posts

    10445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

Posts posted by port-ton

  1. 2 hours ago, Toby said:

    I know some folk have now got their tartan shirts, and assume that as I ordered both for delivery, mine have been held back so they can arrive together.

    But that’s now 14 weeks ago today I ordered those shirts, and I’ve still got nothing. Nearly two weeks since the last update and no confirmation that sending them together is the policy. An indication that the tartan tops can be collected from Cappielow, but not if that applies to shirts ordered for delivery, and no sign of the chevron shirts when the initial indication was that the complicated design of the tartan ones were the reason for the initial hold up.

    If this was anyone else, I’d be going off my tits by now. I suspect we’ll get another update email from your man Ross Dunbar when he sees some grumbles on here, but to be honest, I’m getting a bit sick of being thanked for my patience.

    For all the positive steps the club have made and are making, this fiasco has been terribly disappointing.

    I emailed Ross last week and he had an automatic out of office until 15th August. There's obviously other people at the club who could be dealing with it, but if he's the one personally involved with the shirts then that may be the reason why you've not heard anything. 

  2. With Mullen looking like he's injured this is a really key signing to get someone in of this calibre. I've been majorly impressed with Mullen so far and his distribution has been key to the  less direct style of play we've tried to implement so far this season so I'd be disappointed if he's now lost his place as I can't imagine macdonald signed to be back up, but it's a very good problem to have. 

     

  3. While there is clearly friction between the board and Imrie regarding signings I don't really think there should be a statement from the club regarding budgets at this stage of the season unless it's something drastic like last summers statement. 

    We are still in July but if we get well in to the season with three or four subs every week then it's clear there's a budgetary issue compared to last season and at that point I think it's fair for fans to expect some kind of statement from a community owned club why that is considering the increased prize money, sponsorships, MCT members, season ticket sales and merchandise sales. 

    I've not saw a fan who thinks MCT should be throwing money at Imrie to sign who he wants, but there is definitely a portion of fans wondering why the players we have lost in the summer vs the players brought in so far don't add up, even excluding "bonus" signings like Ali Crawford, but again July is far too early to be demanding information from the club as we have to let the window play out first. 

  4. 2 hours ago, Alibi said:

    Regarding the “not able to fill the bench” thing, the number of substitutes allowed has increased over the years from zero to whatever it is now, 7 in our league, but do we really need that many? Seems to me that having a smaller number is fine in practice. A keeper and 3 other subs should cover most eventualities. Having more subs maybe gives a bit more flexibility to tailor the tactics and if you have more players available and being paid anyway it probably doesn’t affect costs, but I doubt it really handicaps the team.

    You could maybe make that argument if our opposition had similar amounts of substitutes however if the team we are playing has more flexibility from the bench in terms of numbers and quality then that gives them a distinct advantage over us in a league where most of the teams are seperated by fine margins. 

  5. Not sure what thread to put it in but O'connor is in the tele today absolutely slating the state of the pitch and saying its one of the worst he's ever played on and parts of it are almost unplayable. 

    You imagine it's only going to get worse and not better as the season goes on which is hardly ideal considering our excellent home record under Imrie. 

     

  6. 5 minutes ago, SpoonTon said:

    Imrie would probably want to sign half a dozen additional young squad players, but we don't have the budget for that. It's perfectly reasonable for the Imrie to tell the lad that he'd love to sign him if the budget was available for that. 

    There's a big difference between not having the budget for that and not having the budget for any more players. 

    Given Imrie's transfer record of ins and outs at the club I'd say 6 additional young players is the last thing he wants at the club so if he wanted Deane then there's a reason why. From what Ive heard he didn't tell him he'd love to sign him but couldn't, the deal was agreed and then pulled for some sort of budgetary reason that I'm not aware of. 

    We as fans can only judge it once we see what the rest of our transfer window is like, so while there's no need for panic it's still the sort of bizarre Morton story that seems to rear it's head and then come out in to the open later like the financial worries last summer that no one believed until the club released a statement. 

     

     

     

  7. Frankie Deanes dad saying he wanted to sign but no money. I had heard that Dougie wanted to sign him and Deane wanted to sign but couldn't due to something to do with the budget. What that means for the playing budget I don't know. Is it smaller than it was last season? Has it been cut further recently that Dougie wasn't expecting or is it something else. I'm sure it will come out in the end as always. 

    I'm hoping we still have the budget for a rightback as we desperately need one. Anything else is just padding to the squad. 

  8. 11 minutes ago, AyrshireTon said:

    I'll hazard a guess that the Tik-tok-er guy isn't getting signed either.

    In the tele today that none of the trialists are getting offered a contract. Deane was the only one I thought was good enough but it's not really ideal that we've had trialists in for weeks and are now at a stage of the seasom where we can't give new trialists any games and have nothing to show for it so far. 

    • Upvote 1
  9. I just don't think it was a very interesting evening planned. Gerry and Andy get rolled out constantly and who in 2023 wants to hear stories from Chick Young. You'd realistically need to be over 40 to have any interest in the evening and a large portion of the 18-25 demographic of fans probably havent even heard of him nevermind want to hear him talk pish about the 80s so you're cutting off a large slice of potential ticket sales which doesn't seem wise to me at all. 

    I'd have happily went to a "warm up night" for Saturdays game but If nights like these are going to work then they need to feel special and unmissable. A night with Brandon Diau or something. 

    • Upvote 1
  10. 3 minutes ago, ChampTon said:

    Schwake was part of a promoted Edinburgh team and was in TOTY that season. Mullen had about 6 first team games for a relegated Clyde side.

    Efe comes with bags of experience at the very top level, over 50 caps for Nigeria and an AFCON Champion. Broadfoot, regardless of personal choices, was playing for Broomhill last season. 

    I don't know enough about Boyd to compare him with Miller but I agree with others in their skepticism over these signings. 

    This is Imrie though we have to remember, not some absolute diddy like Gus McPherson et al.

    Despite those accolades Dougie still clearly didn't fancy Schwake at times throughout the season. 

    Similar with Efe and his accolades. They sound impressive but I'd still have Jack Baird ahead of him every day of the week so I'm not too bothered at this stage of how players look on paper, because about 95% of dougie's signings on paper have looked utter dung and the majority of them have been a success. 

    Theres every chance the signings could turn out to be worse but they're not at a level of difference between who they're replacing that I'm panicking. 

    • Upvote 1
  11. 5 minutes ago, RossMcC1874 said:

    I have heard of him but honestly can't remember him at all. Again I'm just going to trust Dougie's judgement on this one but IMO none of the signings so far other than Waters have been anywhere near the quality I think we would have been looking for.

    I know the budget does come into play but surely we should be strengthen the side, none of the signings so far have made us better. 

    There's no one that we have brought in so far that is a proven downgrade on their replacement. Mullen, Broadfoot and Boyd could be as good as Schwake, Efe and Miller if not better for all we know. 

    Grimmy needs replaced and we won't get in someone as good but he's still replaceable with a competent fullback. 

    The squad is still a bit light compared to last season however most of our strength and depth came from signings once the season already started and I wouldn't be surprised to see that happen again. 

     

    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...