Jump to content
TheMortonForum.com

Argies Move For Falklands?


forza ton

Recommended Posts

i see argentina have made moves to the u.n. looking to extend their continental shelf beyond the falklands. when in trouble sometimes the spooks of old blighty conjure up wee wars.

 

good for the economy you see, old boy.

 

 

naw, good the Westminster government that wants to be re-elected.

 

Didn't some old sheila prove that around 1982 ?

 

:blink:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i thought we already had a couple of wars. don't we?

 

but i suppose they're not the kind to win elections.

 

 

I think you are 100% on the money, Manky.

 

Whereas the Argies are a dawdle.

 

Just what Mr Brown needs.

 

:(

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never mind that confict, lets go all 70's. The UK is skint, Iceland is skint so have another cod war, let the fish fight while the respective governments rake in global aid.

 

Although it's my idea, I oppose war in general so join my movement. People against the percecution of piscatorial patriots

Remember The Alamo --- MORTON 5 THE MIDDEN BUT 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never mind that confict, lets go all 70's. The UK is skint, Iceland is skint so have another cod war, let the fish fight while the respective governments rake in global aid.

 

Although it's my idea, I oppose war in general so join my movement. People against the percecution of piscatorial patriots

 

 

Better the PPPP than the KKK.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why does the word 'argies' seem to be acceptable.. but '*racial slur removed*' isnt... whats the ****ing difference.... even now on tv when programmes repeat the glorious victory in the falklands thay use that word.. argies... is it ok to cut some words short and not others.. or are all argies .. white ??

There are some questions that are too important, some truths too powerful, some messages too liberating, that they can never be heard for fear they might actually provide you with the freedom you desire and that 'they' then lose the dependence you have on them and for which they are rewarded. They lose the hold they have over you which keeps you spellbound and feeds their ego, their hunger for power and their raison d'etre.

- Think for Yourself, Ask Your own questions, Do Your own research! ...... Set Yourselves Free!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why does the word 'argies' seem to be acceptable.. but '*racial slur removed*' isnt... whats the ****ing difference.... ?

I don't think it's the words themselves that determine if they're acceptable or not, but rather the intent behind them. So I think the difference between and acceptable and unacceptable really depends on whether it's meant to be derogatory or not.

 

For example I wouldn't consider 'Aussie' to be unacceptable because it's rarely if ever used with insulting, derogatory or offensive intent. But terms like 'Argie', 'I-tie', 'Japs' and most certainly 'P aki' often or even usually are. So for that reason I personally wouldn't use them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's the words themselves that determine if they're acceptable or not, but rather the intent behind them. So I think it really depends if its use is meant to be derogatory or not.

 

For example I wouldn't consider 'Aussie' to be unacceptable because it's rarely if ever used with insulting, derogatory or offensive intent. But terms like 'Argie', 'I-tie' and most certainly 'P aki' often or even usually are.

 

 

no.. cause if i was to walk past two of strathclydes finest and ask them where the best 'chinky' was in town.. i would probably spend the remainder of my life flitting between countries on a govt 747... and.. most time the word '*racial slur removed*' is used is in reference to a shop.. not a person..

There are some questions that are too important, some truths too powerful, some messages too liberating, that they can never be heard for fear they might actually provide you with the freedom you desire and that 'they' then lose the dependence you have on them and for which they are rewarded. They lose the hold they have over you which keeps you spellbound and feeds their ego, their hunger for power and their raison d'etre.

- Think for Yourself, Ask Your own questions, Do Your own research! ...... Set Yourselves Free!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no.. cause if i was to walk past two of strathclydes finest and ask them where the best 'chinky' was in town.. i would probably spend the remainder of my life flitting between countries on a govt 747... and.. most time the word '*racial slur removed*' is used is in reference to a shop.. not a person..

You're missing the point. I'm not saying that using these terms are always meant to be offensive, but they often are. So if you use them 'innocently' then you leave yourself open to possible misinterpretation of your intent. So for that reason I prefer not to use them.

 

And I would definately disagree that 'P aki' is used more to refer to shops rather than the person, but that's by the by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're missing the point. I'm not saying that using these terms are always meant to be offensive, but they often are. So if you use them 'innocently' then you leave yourself open to possible misinterpretation of your intent. So for that reason I prefer not to use them.

 

And I would definately disagree that 'P aki' is used more to refer to shops rather than the person, but that's by the by.

 

Totally agree, its all about the intent.

 

Calling a negro "black" is fine.. add the word "****" to it and then you have a problem.

 

Never really got the whole racism thing mind you... I mean how on earth can you hate someone because of their nationality or colour of skin?... doesn't make sense to me.

 

 

edit: mods, why was the "b" word removed above, when it is a perfectly acceptable word for an illegitimate child?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The arguments over the sovereignty of the Falkalnds is rearing its head again because it has been established that there are significant oil reserves in the Falklands basin. That's what it's really about.

"Any nation given the opportunity to regain its national sovereignty and which then rejects it is so far beneath contempt that it is hard to put words to it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

naw, good the Westminster government that wants to be re-elected.

 

Didn't some old sheila prove that around 1982 ?

 

:blink:

:huh: thats kinda what i was getting at :D

 

The arguments over the sovereignty of the Falkalnds is rearing its head again because it has been established that there are significant oil reserves in the Falklands basin. That's what it's really about.

even better. i hear the munitions companies are doing quite well at the mo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having wasted four months of my life in the Falkland Islands I'm very much of the opinion that they should belong to the Argentinians. I've also found every Argentinian that I've ever meet a hell of a lot friendlier that the inbreds that you get down there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having wasted four months of my life in the Falkland Islands I'm very much of the opinion that they should belong to the Argentinians. I've also found every Argentinian that I've ever meet a hell of a lot friendlier that the inbreds that you get down there.

were u working there rossi? i always imagine it like the hebrides without the fun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

were u working there rossi? i always imagine it like the hebrides without the fun

 

I spent four months down there with the RAF, its a bit like the Shetlands but with penguins. I also spent 2 years up in the Shetlands and loved the place, I wish I could say the same for the Malvinas Islands oops I mean the Falklands.

 

Rossi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...