dunning1874 - TheMortonForum.com Jump to content
TheMortonForum.com

dunning1874

Members
  • Posts

    10119
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    117

dunning1874 last won the day on March 17

dunning1874 had the most liked content!

About dunning1874

  • Birthday 12/30/1990

Profile Information

  • Location
    Greenock

Recent Profile Visitors

24746 profile views

dunning1874's Achievements

2.5k

Reputation

  1. I don't have an issue with Imrie calling out McGrattan, because hamstrung as he might be by having the wretched excuse for a footballer that is Tyler French behind him, McGrattan has had chances to step into the starting XI and has played very, very badly. That was probably his last start in a Morton shirt today and if he doesn't get another chance before being released in the summer then tough shit, you had your chance to step up and didn't take it. What I do have an issue with is throwing barely concealed digs at someone like McGrattan when a player who casts himself as a linchpin of the team escapes criticism from Imrie entirely. I'm absolutely not saying it would be appropriate for a manager to start bodying players in public, but he's obviously doing it of his own accord already. If you're going to have a dig at anyone, call out the player who has spent the last two months delivering performances Adam Coakley would have been embarrassed with. Today is genuinely the angriest I've been at a Morton performance in Imrie’s time in charge, and Robbie Muirhead is the reason. Footballers miss penalties, that is entirely reasonable and forgivable, but what's not forgivable was seeing him only then start to try for the first time in 2024. In that 10 minutes after taking the most telegraphed penalty of all time he was absolutely bursting his arse: showing for passes, pressing centre backs, competing for every high ball. Things he has steadfastly refused to lower himself to for the last six weeks, because he thinks he's above it, and it was only today when the dropped points were undeniably his fault that he finally decided it was worth his while to leave first gear and try to make a difference, but it was too little, too late. I'm genuinely fucking aghast at how brazen he's been about it and I can't see how anyone could justify offering him a contract at this point: if this is your approach to Championship football then enjoy your mid-table League Two finish with East Kilbride next season.
  2. We'd have been better with Easdale in the team than Muirhead the last two months. He shouldn't be getting a contract in the summer. The season is now about getting enough points to make 8th. We'll be more likely to get there if we don't see French or Broadfoot again.
  3. As the McGrattan fanboy in chief, him getting a start ahead of Garrity is wild on recent form. Hopefully the return of Gorgeous George hauls the rest of the team back up to his level.
  4. First and foremost, the transparency here is excellent. You'll not get anything like that from another Championship club. The headline figure that we're heading for around a £200K profit this season even if we finish 8th is great news. Obviously we're not going to get Celtic or Rangers away every season, but it seems like we're moving into a more stable position with every year and the profit from this season can be used to increase the first team budget for next season, even with some of it being held back to keep us on an even keel in the event cup runs and/or a higher league position than budgeted don't materialise.
  5. That pre-Oakley unbeaten run last season we were very reliant on natural width with Quitongo on the right and McGrattan or Kabia on the left, with the long balls primarily aimed at finding the feet of wingers rather than going for Muirhead's head and trying to play off flick ons. I can understand why Imrie has stuck with things like Blues on the right when he was in fantastic form there until a few games ago, but in Oakley's absence we need that natural width back to give us an outball. Having naturally central players there is fine when we're scrapping for second balls in a congested middle of the park and you want whoever's playing out wide to be comfortable stepping inside, but with no target man to aim at we need players who are comfortable opening up space by hugging the touchline, linking up with Strapp and French and carrying us up the park by running at full backs. Garrity has to start next week.
  6. Strapp was the only one of the starting XI getting pass marks and he's off as well. Fucking nonsense.
  7. Make subs when the game's already gone and leaves French on. This is mad.
  8. I've seen managers get the brainwave to move full backs into holding midfield before and it usually goes terribly, but at least you can often see the thought process in those full backs being good passers of the ball so might be able to spray it around from midfield. I think French genuinely has the worst distribution of any professional footballer I've ever seen including goalkeepers, and he's predictably been even more abysmal than usual. The goal though is entirely on Power. Absolutely brainless to try to bring it down and take a touch with the ball dropping in that area of the park with Graham a yard away from it him, he was always more likely to lose it than keep it and there's nothing anyone else can do about it once Graham's away from Power. It had been coming though, we've looked lost since kick-off. The feeling without Oakley has been that we're beaten as soon as we're behind, and we've had even less attacking threat here than we've had in any of the last four games with Gillespie also having no idea what he's doing in an advanced role and no width. With Broadfoot on a booking get him off for Garrity and reshuffle everyone else into their real positions.
  9. This is a 4-2-3-1 with O'Connor right back, Power and French sitting, Gillespie in the middle of the 3. This seems insane.
  10. No wins or clean sheets in 8 for Partick, no goals in 5 of our last 6. I'd be fine to see us persist with the back three here, Broadfoot man marking Graham isn't the worst idea and the performance against Hearts was certainly the best we've had in this run without Oakley. If you wanted to make it more attacking to account for not needing to be as defensive at Firhill as against Hearts you could have Crawford deeper and put Garrity or McGrattan in for Gillespie to play off Muirhead, but I'd leave it as is as that probably brings too much of a risk of giving up the midfield. If Crawford plays his usual pressing game while their wingers manage to pin Strapp & French back, that could easily turn into a 5-2-3 rather than 3-5-1-1 and you've isolated Power and Blues.
  11. It does say this in the GMFC Articles, but agreed that it's not the best look for the club to be mixing the two up in an official update. As for Harkins being co-opted as an MCT representative, I don't particularly have an issue with this. While all of the Directors who are there in a capacity as MCT representatives should really have gone through the process of being elected to that board by the membership in the first place, the fact is that the MCT majority representation does need to be maintained and we're still under three years into fan ownership, so we've not really had a great amount of time to have that pipeline of MCT board to GMFC board setup. In fact I think I'm right in saying that none of the 7 current MCT board members have been on the board for two years, and it's possible none of them want to make that move. I don't really see this turnover of directors as a problem rather than the inevitable consequence of having big changes so recently, with that initial group of MCT directors moving to the GMFC board as the takeover was completed follower by needing a fresh group of MCT directors, then we've also had further changes to the articles of both GMFC & MCT in the years since the takeover to define how the two boards should interact. It's inevitable that it would take some time to stabilise in the initial years of what is still a relatively recent ownership change, but hopefully if something like this comes up again in another couple of years we won't have the same need to look outside the existing MCT directors.
  12. There are plenty of questions about the XI if Oakley isn't fit, and we've explicitly been told by the manager there's no chance. He is not making it. In his absence over the last three games Imrie has switched between Quitongo and Muirhead up front, so there's the obvious first debate. We've gone with natural width with Garrity & McGrattan starting once and persisted with Muirhead and Blues out wide in the other two - which had Millen screaming "too narrow" at the pair of them for most of the first half v Dundee United - while there's also a debate about whether we'd rather have Blues or Gillespie beside Power. Broadfoot is also fit again with O'Connor having had two dreadful performances in a row so it's possible you could see a change there, while we even switched to a back three with Broadfoot coming on against Inverness. The team is a long way away from picking itself, there are five or six variations of personnel or formation that wouldn't be a surprise.
  13. A bad day and defeat was inevitably going to come after such a long run, but unfortunate that it was today considering the upcoming fixtures. The concern is if that's going to be typical of performances without Oakley and Wilson: without them we have no physical presence to speak of outwith the centre backs and every team in the division could bully us the way Inverness did today. Inverness well worth the win, managed having an early lead superbly and outwith the disallowed goal we created absolutely f**k all, because they didn't let us.
  14. Bearne the only attacking sub, it's not taken much for us to be back to bare bones. Arguable that Wilson, Oakley and Mullen are the three worst players to lose but that's still a good starting XI.
  15. Imrie's 100th game in charge. What a manager he's been for us. Mullen, Wilson and Oakley all missing is a huge blow. Assuming Muirhead and Quitongo are in better shape than they were they on Tuesday but still not 100% I'd only start one of them here, preferably Muirhead at centre forward. We can have fresher legs out wide with Garrity and McGrattan with Blues moving inside rather than starting Gillespie and Power together, as you'll surely not get 90 minutes out of Power if we're starting him again v Dundee United. Quitongo is then a great impact sub. We don't want to risk more injuries when it was clear neither Muirhead or Quitongo were fully fit on Tuesday and we've got another Tuesday night game on the way.
×
×
  • Create New...